|
|
Post by pyke13 on Jul 11, 2019 11:49:51 GMT
You know when your a total muppet who claims to be a reporter, then reports live on Facebook from outside a court house on a case with a no reporting ban. This is what happens, guess it doesn't help that he is as guilty of hate speech as the ppl he protests about. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48950672 |
|
treeboy
New Member
Posts: 7
Likes: 5
|
Post by treeboy on Jul 11, 2019 22:46:20 GMT
Shame he didn't get a longer stretch,have witnessed this snivelling little creeps rascistm at first hand!
|
|
|
|
Post by VanWoman84 on Jul 11, 2019 23:22:11 GMT
The judiciary don't like it when you mess with the courts, he's brought it on himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by pyke13 on Jul 12, 2019 18:52:44 GMT
He claims to be a journalist, he should therefore have been aware of the reporting ban. He then decided to ignore the law and stream it live to the Internet. Stupid is as stupid does.
|
|
|
|
Post by VanWoman84 on Jul 12, 2019 19:33:51 GMT
...and then not one, but FIVE defence lawyers tried to get the trial stopped due to unfair "reporting" bias. Way to go numbnuts!!
|
|
|
|
Post by pyke13 on Jul 21, 2019 20:05:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by VanWoman84 on Jul 21, 2019 20:37:58 GMT
He was punched by a 70 year old! Priceless!  |
|
|
|
Post by bernie on Jul 21, 2019 22:24:20 GMT
I'm not convinced one way or the other about Tommy Robinson. On the one hand he appears to be a racist A**hole. On the other side he does measure up as a person who believes in what he is saying enough to face down the law and go to prison happily for what he believes to be the truth.
Now I don't have a side in this debate but he was sent to prison for reporting on grooming gang targeting under age girls. You might well say, why was there a reporting restriction in the first place?
You can call him the far right, I can respect your aversion, but everything he has done to date has been remarkably focussed on getting to the truth and has paid a huge price for fighting the establishment. An outcome he expected all along.
Sometimes we need to re- evaluate
|
|
|
|
Post by lika on Jul 22, 2019 6:00:45 GMT
|
|
boaty
Full Member
Posts: 247
Likes: 393
|
Post by boaty on Jul 22, 2019 23:36:37 GMT
He was guilty of contempt of court, contempt of our system designed to enable a fair trial. There's nothing to stop him reporting on people who have been found guilty, but until then people are presumed innocent and entitled to trial by an unbiased jury.
If some idiot makes it impossible for an unbiased jury to be found then the accused, guilty or not, will walk free.
|
|
|
|
Post by pyke13 on Aug 8, 2019 22:07:06 GMT
I'm not convinced one way or the other about Tommy Robinson. On the one hand he appears to be a racist A**hole. On the other side he does measure up as a person who believes in what he is saying enough to face down the law and go to prison happily for what he believes to be the truth. Now I don't have a side in this debate but he was sent to prison for reporting on grooming gang targeting under age girls. You might well say, why was there a reporting restriction in the first place? You can call him the far right, I can respect your aversion, but everything he has done to date has been remarkably focussed on getting to the truth and has paid a huge price for fighting the establishment. An outcome he expected all along. Sometimes we need to re- evaluate Your spot on about him coming across as a racist Arsehole, the big problem with him standing up for the truth is it's his version of the truths. He has no interest in reporting factually on anything other than Muslims Sex offenders. If he wasn't the far right wanker he is then surley at some point he would have reported on the EDL members found guilty and jailed for child sex acts. Or doesn't that count as their white British peodophiles? As for him going to jail for his beliefs, well there's no such thing as bad publicity is there? How many folk do you recon have softened to him for the same reasons you mention above? |
|
